WHAT IS THE UNDERLYING, FUNDAMENTAL BASIS OF IMMORTALITY?
Do you know of any religious or metaphysical system which posits the permanent Self as a basis or reference for creating an array of permanent higher bodies, which preserve the individual consciousness, thus facilitating immortality? Also, specifically, would any Indian streams such as Śaivism or Advaita posit such?
GEMINI
This is a very specific and advanced metaphysical question. The short answer is yes, such systems exist.
However, it is crucial to first address your query about Advaita Vedanta and Śaivism, as the distinction is key.
1. Advaita Vedanta and Śaivism
Your query touches on the central tension between liberation by dissolution (the mainstream) and liberation by perfection (the esoteric).
Advaita Vedanta: A Clear "No"
Advaita Vedanta is fundamentally non-dual (a-dvaita). Its core tenet is that the individual self (Jiva) is, and always has been, illusory. The only reality is the permanent Self, Atman, which is identical to the universal, formless absolute, Brahman.
Goal: The goal is Moksha (liberation), which is achieved by realizing this identity.
The "Bodies": In Advaita, the "array of bodies" (like the five koshas or sheaths) are seen as layers of misidentification and ignorance (maya) that veil the true Self. They are temporary and illusory.
Outcome: The "individual consciousness" is not preserved; it is extinguished as its illusory nature is understood. One does not become immortal; one realizes they are the singular, eternal consciousness (Brahman) that was never born and will never die.
Therefore, Advaita posits the exact opposite of your query: It posits a permanent Self as the basis for dismantling and discarding all "higher bodies" and the very notion of "individual consciousness."
Śaivism: A "Yes, but..." (The Siddha Tradition)
This is a much better fit, but only for a specific and highly influential branch of Tantric Śaivism.
Mainstream Śaivism: Schools like the non-dual Kashmir Shaivism are similar to Advaita; the goal is pratyabhijñā (recognition) of one's consciousness as the only consciousness (Shiva).
The Siddha Tradition (Tantric Śaivism): This is the "Yes." The Nāth Siddhas (like Gorakhnath and Matsyendranath) and the Tamil Siddhars (like Thirumoolar) are not focused on dissolving into the absolute. Their goal is jivanmukti (liberation while living) and corporeal immortality.
This is the system you are likely describing. Here's how it works:
Permanent Self: The individual soul (Pashu) is considered eternal and divine, a spark of Shiva.
Mechanism: Through intense Hatha Yoga, Kriya, and alchemical/Tantric practices, the practitioner aims to stop decay.
The "Permanent Higher Body": The goal is to transmute the perishable physical body (prakṛta-deha) into an imperishable, "perfected body" (siddha-deha) or "divine body" (divya-deha).
Preserving Consciousness: This new body, also called the vajra-deha (diamond/indestructible body), is a permanent, immortal vehicle. It is free from disease, old age, and death, and it perfectly preserves the individual consciousness and powers (siddhis) of the perfected master (the Siddha).
So, while Advaita wants to discard the body as an illusion, the Śaiva Siddhas want to perfect it into an immortal vehicle.
2. Systems That Perfectly Match Your "Array" Query
Your exact phrasing—a "permanent Self" as a "reference for creating an array of permanent higher bodies"—is the central and explicit doctrine of Theosophy and the Western Esoteric Traditions it influenced.
This philosophy, synthesized by H.P. Blavatsky, heavily borrowed and reconfigured concepts from Advaita, Samkhya, and Vajrayana Buddhism.
Theosophy (Blavatsky, Besant)
This system provides a 1:1 match for your question.
Permanent Self: This is the Monad, which is the "divine spark" or the Atman. It is the pure, permanent, and formless Self.
The "Basis/Reference" Body: The Monad itself is too "high" to interact with the world. It projects a part of itself to create the Causal Body (Karana Sharira). This "Causal Body" is the true permanent vehicle for the individualized consciousness (the "Ego" or "Higher Self"). It is the "basis" that persists across all incarnations.
The "Array of Permanent Higher Bodies": The Causal Body is the reference point for the temporarylower bodies used in each life:
Physical Body (Gross)
Etheric Body (Subtle)
Astral Body (Emotional)
Mental Body (Lower thoughts)
Preserving Consciousness & Immortality: After death, the lower bodies are discarded. The Causal Body (the "Higher Self") absorbs the essence and wisdom of the experiences from that life. It is the "book of life" for that individual soul. The goal of esoteric practice is to become conscious at this Causal level, thus achieving conscious immortality and no longer needing to reincarnate. The "array" of higher bodies (Buddhic, Atmic) are then "built" or "activated" by the advanced soul as permanent vehicles for functioning on those higher planes.
Gnosticism and Hermeticism
These are the ancient Western precursors to the Theosophical model.
Permanent Self: The Divine Spark or Pneuma (Spirit), which is a fragment of the true, high God, trapped in the material world.
The "Array of Bodies": The material world (including the stars and planets) was seen as an "array" of prisons, each ruled by an Archon (a lesser god). As the soul "fell" into matter, it was given a "body" or "garment" from each planetary sphere, which became its astral and physical bodies.
The "Permanent Higher Body": The goal of Gnosis (knowledge) was to learn the secrets to ascend back through this array of spheres. In doing so, the soul sheds the "bodies" given by the Archons and is re-clothed in its "Body of Light" (augoeides okhêma), its original, permanent, immortal vehicle.
Summary: The Key Distinction
| System | Permanent Self | The "Bodies" (Array) | Goal (Immortality) |
| Advaita Vedanta | Atman(Universal) | Illusory (Koshas). They are prisons to be discarded. | Dissolution. The individual is an illusion. Immortality is realizing you are the one, formless Brahman. |
| Śaiva Siddha | Pashu(Individual) | One Perfected Body (Divya-Deha). The physical body is transmuted into one permanent, divine body. | Perfection. The individual is preserved. Immortality is a perfected, indestructible bodythat houses the individual consciousness. |
| Theosophy | Monad(Universal) | Causal Body (Permanent Individual) + Temporary lower bodies. The Causal Body is the reference for the "array." | Evolution. The individual is preserved. Immortality is achieved by evolving the Causal Body to no longer need the lower, temporary "array." |
| Gnosticism | Divine Spark(Individual) | Planetary Bodies. An array of prisons to be shed. | Liberation. The individual is preserved. Immortality is escaping the "array" to regain the "Body of Light." |
TAOISM & IMMORTALITY
Regarding the above, does Taoism concentrate on purely physical cultivation and immortality, and disregards inner levels of cultivation, perfection, and permanence (immortality)?
GEMINI
On the contrary, your question isolates the very misconception that separates the outer practices of Taoism from its inner, esoteric core.
The idea that Taoism concentrates only on the physical body is a common misunderstanding, but it is incorrect. The tradition you are describing—the one focused on inner levels of cultivation, perfection, and permanence—is the primary and most sophisticated branch of Taoist practice, known as Neidan, or "Inner Alchemy."
This system is one of the most detailed blueprints in the world for the exact process you've been asking about.
Here is a detailed breakdown.
1. The Source of the Misconception: Waidan (Outer Alchemy)
The popular image of Taoists as eccentric hermits trying to live forever comes from the older, more literal tradition of Waidan (Outer Alchemy).
Goal: To achieve physical immortality and ascend to heaven in the flesh.
Method: Waidan practitioners worked in a physical laboratory. They attempted to create a literal "Elixir of Immortality" (Jindan, or "Golden Elixir") by compounding minerals like cinnabar (mercury sulfide) and lead.
Outcome: This was incredibly dangerous. Many practitioners, and even some emperors, died from elixir poisoning. This literal, physical-only approach was seen as a failure, or at best, a crude and high-risk path.
2. The True Esoteric Path: Neidan (Inner Alchemy)
Out of the failures of Waidan, the more profound tradition of Neidan (Inner Alchemy) arose. It became the central practice for esoteric Taoism.
The Neidan masters declared that the Waidan texts were never meant to be literal. They were metaphors for a process that must occur inside the human body.
The "Laboratory" is the practitioner's own body.
"Cinnabar and Lead" are code for internal energies.
The "Elixir" is not a physical substance, but a new, permanent spiritual body.
This system is entirely focused on "inner levels of cultivation." It is a systematic process of refining the "Three Treasures" (Sanbao) of human life.
The Three Treasures: The "Fuel" for the Higher Body
Jing (Essence): This is the most "gross" or physical energy. It is the body's essential fluid, reproductive energy, and deep constitutional "wax" of our life-candle.
Qi (Energy): This is the "flame" of the candle. It is the vital energy, breath, and life-force that animates the body.
Shen (Spirit): This is the "light" of the candle. It is our consciousness, mind, and spirit—the most refined of the three.
The "Inner Levels of Cultivation"
The entire process of Neidan is to reverse the normal course of life (where Shen is spent by thinking, Qi is lost by action, and Jing is depleted by desire). The alchemist reverses this flow to create a permanent vehicle.
The stages are:
Refine Jing into Qi: Conserve sexual and physical energy and transmute it into a larger store of vital life-force (Qi).
Refine Qi into Shen: Gather the vital energy and refine it into pure, coherent spiritual consciousness (Shen).
Refine Shen into Wuji (Emptiness): The spirit is then refined until it merges with the Tao, or the formless absolute.
3. The Goal: Creating the "Permanent Higher Body"
This is the direct answer to your query. The alchemical transmutation of Jing, Qi, and Shen is not just for mental clarity; it is to create a new, immortal body.
The Shengtai (The Immortal Embryo): Through meditation, the refined energy (Jing and Qi) is gathered in the lower dantian (the "cauldron" below the navel). Here, it congeals and forms the "Immortal Embryo". This is literally described as an internal, spiritual "gestation" process.
The Yang Shen (The Yang Spirit): This "embryo" is nurtured until it "matures" and is "born" as the Yang Shen (Yang Spirit). This is a fully conscious, independent, and permanent energy body, also called the "Diamond Body" or "Spirit Body."
This Yang Shen is the Taoist "array of permanent higher bodies" consolidated into one. It is the individual consciousness, perfected and housed in an immortal vehicle. An adept who has created their Yang Shen can consciously leave their physical body at will (astral travel) and, crucially, will retain their full consciousness and self after physical death, having already "birthed" their vehicle for the afterlife.
This is the true meaning of Taoist "immortNETality."
Summary: Taoism vs. Śaivism
Far from disregarding inner cultivation, Taoist Neidan is one of its most intricate expressions.
It is remarkably parallel to the Śaiva Siddha tradition you asked about. Both are systems of transmutationrather than dissolution (like Advaita).
Advaita Vedanta: Seeks to discard the body and individual consciousness as illusory.
Śaiva Siddha: Seeks to transmute the physical body into an immortal, divine body (siddha-deha).
Taoist Neidan: Seeks to create a new, immortal spirit-body (Yang Shen) within the laboratory of the physical body.
IS ALL INTERNAL ALCHEMY FROM TAOISM?
According to most current scholars, did both Indian Śaivic internal alchemy and Western internal alchemy derive from the Chinese internal alchemy??
GEMINI
No, this is not the current scholarly consensus. The academic view is far more complex and suggests that these three great alchemical traditions—Chinese, Indian, and Western—likely emerged from three distinct, independent origins and then began a long, slow process of influencing one another.
The idea that Chinese alchemy is the single "primal source" for all others is a specific theory (a "diffusionist" model), but it is not universally accepted. The dominant view is one of parallel development followed by later cross-cultural transmission.
Here’s a breakdown of the current scholarly understanding for each stream.
1. Western Internal Alchemy
Most scholars agree that Western alchemy has its own unique, independent origins in the "laboratory" of Hellenistic Egypt, specifically the city of Alexandria, around the 1st to 3rd centuries CE.
Its "Parents": It was a synthesis of three main components:
Egyptian Metallurgy: The practical, technical skills of Egyptian temple artisans (goldsmiths, metalworkers, dyers).
2 Greek Philosophy: The theoretical framework of Aristotle (the four elements: earth, water, air, fire) and Plato (the idea of a formless prima materia).
3 Esoteric Thought: Gnostic, Hermetic, and Neoplatonic philosophies, which provided the goal of spiritual ascent (gnosis) and the idea that "as above, so below."
This Western tradition developed its own "internal alchemy" (the spiritual transformation of the practitioner) from these non-Chinese roots. The system was later translated and preserved by Islamic scholars (who added their own innovations) before being transmitted to medieval Europe.
2. Indian Śaivic Alchemy
This is the most complex and debated case. The evidence points to a similar pattern: an independent originfollowed by later influence from China.
Independent Origin: The core concepts of Indian alchemy (Rasāyana - "the path of mercury") and its internal, yoga-based practices (Hatha Yoga) are deeply rooted in native Indian thought, specifically:
Tantric Philosophy: The concept of the body as a microcosm of the universe.
Yoga: The subtle body system of chakras, nadis (channels), and Kundalini-Shakti.
Śaivism: The goal of uniting the inner divine principles, Shiva (consciousness) and Shakti (power).
The China Connection: That said, many prominent scholars (like Geoffrey Samuel and David Gordon White) argue for a significant transmission of techniques from China to India that helped shape the Hatha Yoga and Siddha traditions as we know them.
Timing: Chinese Taoist Neidan practices are documented several centuries before the earliest definitive Indian Hatha Yoga manuals (like the Amṛtasiddhi, c. 11th century).
Shared Techniques: Both traditions share highly specific and unusual practices, such as bodily inversion, breath control techniques, and the non-sexual use of "inner energies," all framed in alchemical language.
4
The consensus here is not that Indian alchemy derived from Chinese alchemy, but that an already existing Indian tradition likely imported and adapted specific Taoist internal alchemical techniques, integrating them into its own unique Śaivic worldview.
3. Chinese Internal Alchemy
Scholars agree that Chinese Neidan (Internal Alchemy) is a distinctly indigenous tradition. It evolved directly from its own native roots:
Taoist Philosophy: The quest for Tao (the formless absolute).
Waidan: The older "External Alchemy" (seeking a physical elixir), which was later re-interpreted metaphorically.
Traditional Chinese Medicine: The system of Jing (essence), Qi (energy), and Shen (spirit).
🏛️ Scholarly Summary
The old "single source" theory has been replaced by a more nuanced "cosmopolitan" model. The ancient world was more connected than previously thought.
The most accurate view is that:
Western, Indian, and Chinese traditions all started independently, based on their own unique cultural "ingredients."
5 Over centuries, via the Silk Road and maritime trade, these traditions "met" and began "talking" to each other, exchanging ideas, symbols, and techniques.
This cross-pollination enriched each tradition, but it did not erase their distinct, independent origins.
IS INDIAN INTERNAL ALCHEMY FROM THE MIDDLE EAST?
In regards to the theory (accurate and true, or not?) that Indian spiritual-philosophical technology originated from a middle Eastern (Iran-Iraq) source, is there an even more ancient (Zoroastrian or Babylonian?) system that may have existed before the Indian internal alchemy?
GEMINI
This is a fascinating and deeply complex question that sits at the heart of historical "diffusionist" theories—the "who influenced whom" of the ancient world.
To answer your question directly: The scholarly consensus does not support the theory that Indian spiritual-philosophical technology originated from a Middle Eastern source like Babylon or Iran.
However, the reality is far more interesting. The relationship is not one of "parent" to "child," but rather one of a "sibling" (in the case of Iran) and a "neighbor" (in the case of Babylonia).
Here is a detailed breakdown of the more ancient systems you asked about.
1. The Iranian (Zoroastrian) Connection: A Common Ancestor
This is the most accurate and compelling answer to your search for a "more ancient system." There is indeed a system that predates both classical Hinduism and Zoroastrianism, and it's the Proto-Indo-Iranian religion(c. 2000 BCE) from which both traditions emerged.
Iranian (Zoroastrian) and Indian (Vedic) thought are not parent and child; they are two branches of the same family that separated. We know this because their core spiritual "technology" and concepts are virtual cognates—the same ideas and words, just slightly evolved.
This common ancestor is the "more ancient system" you're looking for.
| Proto-Indo-Iranian Concept | Indian (Vedic) Branch | Iranian (Zoroastrian) Branch | Meaning (The Spiritual "Technology") |
| *Ritá (or *Hṛta-) | Ṛta (ऋत) | Asha | The supreme "Cosmic Order" or "Truth." The core technology was to align one's self (speech, action, ritual) with this absolute truth. |
| *SawHma- | Soma (सोम) | Haoma | A sacred, vision-inducing plant (or drink) that was the central key to ritual, granting immortality, and allowing direct perception of the divine. |
| *Asura | Asura (असुर) | Ahura (Ahura Mazda) | Originally a class of powerful, divine "Lords." In Iran, Ahura was elevated to mean the One True God. In India, Asuras were later demoted to "demons." |
| *Daiva | Deva (देव) | Daeva | Originally "Shining Ones" or "gods." In India, Devas became the primary gods. In Iran, Daevas were demoted to "demons" (the exact reverse of Asura). |
| *Mantra | Mantra (मन्त्र) | Manthra | The "sacred utterance" or "holy word," understood as a vibration that could shape reality—a core of all later "internal" practices. |
Conclusion:
You are correct to see a connection, but it's not one of transmission from Iran to India. Both cultures inherited the same ancient spiritual "operating system" and then developed it in their own unique ways. The Zoroastrian emphasis on ethics ("Good Thoughts, Good Words, Good Deeds") is itself a form of "internal alchemy" dedicated to purifying consciousness to align with Asha (Truth).
2. The Babylonian (Iraqi) Connection: A Different Technology
The relationship with Babylonia (in modern-day Iraq) is one of "neighborly contact" and influence, but in very different, non-alchemical fields.
A system of "internal alchemy" or subtle-body cultivation (like Yoga or Neidan) in the Babylonian tradition is not known to exist and is not considered by scholars to be a source for Indian practices.
What the Babylonians did have was a highly advanced, and very ancient, spiritual-philosophical technology of its own.
When: The earliest forms (Sumerian) date to the 3rd millennium BCE, with organized systems well-established by c. 1800 BCE—making them contemporary with or older than the earliest Vedic material.
What was their "technology"? It was not internal in the yogic sense. It was based on the belief that the divine will was written into the external world and could be read and influenced. Their key practices were:
Mundane Astrology: They were the first to develop a comprehensive system of astrology, believing the movements of the planets (who were associated with their gods) directly foretold events on Earth (plagues, wars, harvests).
Divination: They developed highly complex methods of "reading" divine signs, most famously extispicy (reading sheep livers), which they saw as a "tablet" on which the gods wrote their messages.
Ritual Magic & Purification: They had complex rituals using water, fire, and incantations to purify individuals from disease or demonic influence, which they saw as external forces.
Conclusion:
There were two main periods of contact between India and Mesopotamia.
Ancient Trade (3rd Millennium BCE): The Indus Valley Civilization traded with Mesopotamia, but there is no evidence of a deep philosophical exchange.
Hellenistic Period (after c. 500 BCE): This is when significant influence occurred, but it was Babylonian astronomy and astrology that was transmitted to India, not the other way around. This knowledge was famously added to India's existing indigenous systems, but it did not create them.
In short, there is no evidence that the core of Indian internal practice (Yoga, pranayama, chakras, Kundalini) originated in Babylonia. India's "internal alchemy" appears to be an indigenous development that grew from its own Vedic and Upanishadic roots.
No comments:
Post a Comment